When I was pregnant last year, Ben and I decided to keep the baby's sex a secret for a long time. Why? Because 1) keeping secrets is so much fun in an oversharing society, and 2) I did not want my newborn child to be born into an exclusively pink and ruffly wardrobe, on the off chance we might have a girl (as we did). I wanted to dress my baby in a wide variety of colours (or, a so-called "gender-neutral" wardrobe), and I knew it would be a lot more achievable if we didn't tell anyone what the baby's sex was.
Take modern traditions such as engagement rings and bridal parties, for example. They were born out of random things like advertisement campaigns and attempts to confuse the evil spirits, but now they've become what we're used to without question. And so it is with the notion of pink-for-girls and blue-for-boys. There's no biological reason for girls to wear pink and boys to wear blue. It's just one of those random societal norms, an assumption, another way to easily categorise humans from the moment they're born.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not totally against dressing girl babies in pink, or boy babies in blue. I happily and graciously dress Arden in the pink outfits from our families and friends. But I think it's just kind of weird how society pushes these labels on people, so early on in their little lives.
When I was a child, I was always drawn to what society called "boy stuff". I wanted the "boy" toys in my McDonald's Happy Meals. I wanted to wear primary and dark colours, not pastels with ruffles at the collar. I did not want to wear dresses or heels. I sometimes played with dolls and wore pink hand-me-downs that were comfortable, but I was always more drawn to superhero and sporty stuff. Even now I occasionally buy clothes from the men's section because I prefer their styles. I'll wear bright colours and dresses when I feel like it, but I don't want my outfits to be limited by my gender.
So, I try to dress Arden in "neutral" colours - or just stuff that I like - because I'm her mother and I spend the most time looking at her throughout the day. I also like to dress her in outfits that are functional and comfortable from what I can tell. In my experience, lacy ruffles around the neck and flowery headbands are not comfortable. We dress her in those things every now and then (usually for her ten-minute monthly photoshoots), but definitely not for everyday wear.
Also. I don't think it's fair that girl-babies are socially linked to pink and sometimes purple, while boy-babies get all the other colours of the rainbow. And colours aside, I find it ludicrous that boys are associated with trucks and dinosaurs, while girls get Frozen and ballet. Girls love trucks and dinosaurs. And it goes both ways. The last time I checked, there are great male characters in Frozen; also, boys and grown men alike can be ballet dancers, and they're pretty freakin' good at it too.
If we decide to have another baby and it happens to be a boy, I will probably dress him in Arden's hand-me-downs, "girly" or not. Whether they be pink or purple or blue or grey, they are baby clothes and they look adorable on babies. Arden has a pair of pants with ballet slipper socks attached to them, and I will dress all my children in them, because leggings with socks attached to them are a no-brainer (fact: babies love kicking off their socks).
loooove these ballet-slipper pants. |
There is plenty of time for society to put labels on Arden. We'll get to those moments when we get to them. But for now, while she's young and untouched from all the micro-aggressions and tainted language and political/religious agendas and gendered stereotypes...
I just want to dress my little girl in a Batman shirt and take a billion pictures of her because she looks so darn cute in it.
And. What child doesn't love Batman? I sure did.
CK